These companies face a risk of massive criminal and civil actions against them. These companies have censored information that likely led to countless deaths from an incorrect approach to COVID-19.
Most everyone has heard that social media companies are suppressing information they believe causes “vaccine hesitancy.” It’s hard to comprehend the liability this has created, because it very much appears that the vaccines were a mistake. The vaccines target the spike protein of the original SARS 2 Coronavirus in a manner that appears to cause the virus to mutate and spread more rapidly in human hosts, as opposed to other treatment options such as Ivermectin.
A discussion on Dr. Robert Malone’s Twitter feed began in earnest on the COVID mutations on August 17 when he tweeted a graph from a study done by GISAID in Germany. Another individual overlaid some dates of vaccine trials and rollouts over a graph of how the virus mutated and spread, below. Dr. Malone described his view of the data on August 25: “ADE has not been confirmed in my opinion. The better term is vaccine enhanced replication or disease. ADE is a very specific subset of that broader category. I am hearing many anectdotal reports consistent with vaccine enhanced disease occuring/Delta. Awaiting more solid data.”
Other methods of treatments of COVID were available: Ivermectin in particular. Dr. Malone, who invented the #mRNA technology used by BioNTech, chose to use Ivermectin himself. Now it turns out that Ivermectin was the better choice by a long shot. (I also champion Artemisia annua, but the Doctor has not weighed in with an opinion.)
Recently, September 5, Dr. Malone tweeted that Peru used Ivermectin with great results. Then a new President took over Peru who stopped the Ivermectin campaign and COVID deaths rose sharply. Here’s the study: Ivermectin: a multifaceted drug of Nobel prize-honoured distinction with indicated efficacy against a new global scourge, COVID-19
Below is some more of the study:
And so now it’s “hitting the fan.” In addition to what Dr. Malone is saying, you have at least a few other fires burning on Ivermectin which are exposing the liabilities of these huge social media companies. A Senator from Australia is stating it plainly: Australian Senator Malcolm Roberts On Ivermectin Suppression: ‘They Have Blood On Their Hands’. (Blood on Hands = Sell).
Australian Senator Malcolm Roberts: There are over 40 medical and scientific papers which hail Ivermectin’s success. So why is it banned for this used with COVID in Australia? It raises serious question’s about big pharma’s monopoly and conflict of interest and its stranglehold over government. For example, Google’s parent company, Alphabet, owns Youtube. Youtube has banned any videos that even mentioned Ivermectin as a possible COVID treatment. They even took down one of my videos, and I’m a federal senator.
So if you’re holding one of these stocks, you’re holding the stocks of a company that suppressed information that led to a large number of avoidable deaths. And for what? Basically to sell vaccines. Vaccines that spread the disease. If that isn’t a Sell Signal, I don’t know what is. It’s hitting the fan elsewhere to. Rachel Maddow tweeted some disinformation about Ivermectin, an extreme exaggeration of complications from Ivermectin. And Greenwald wanted to know why Twitter didn’t censor Maddow like they had been doing with so-called “anti-vaxxers.” This is the same Twitter that actually censored a US Representative for speaking out against mandatory vaccinations of the military. Below is Greenwald’s tweet with 7,400 retweets questioning Twitter’s censorship policy. I’ll add my thoughts on the censorship later. Below is also a factcheck of the Ivermectin disinformation by Kristi Leigh.
Kristi Leigh reported ‘KFOR RAN THIS EVEN AFTER RUNNING A STORY DATED A WEEK PRIOR, SAYING 11 PEOPLE HAD CALLED CENTER FOR POISON AND DRUG SINCE MAY. ELEVEN PEOPLE? OVER THE COURSE OF 3-4 MONTHS? DOES THAT SOUND LIKE IT WOULD CLOG UP HOSPITALS ? WERE ANY ADMITTED TO ICU? DID ANYONE DIE? NO.”
I did a Twitter thread on August 17 about the censorship issue and noted that Twitter had censored U.S. Representative Marjorie Taylor Green, among a broader look at Twitter, Facebook, and Youtube. It’s hard to believe Twitter would do this but they did. Think this will play against Twitter in the inevitable class action lawsuits? I do. If you’re going to censor information that involves the deaths of hundreds of thousands of Americans, you’d better be right about it. They were not. Here’s a link to the Reuters article on Twitter censoring Representative Marjorie Taylor Green: Twitter temporarily blocks U.S. Republican Greene for COVID-19 posts
Here’s my thoughts on censorship: there shouldn’t be censorship of real human beings as long as they’re not making threats or some other terms of service issue. Opinions vary. Always have, always will. We don’t need Facebook, Twitter, and Youtube telling us what is right and wrong. Yes, even on vaccines. Gleen Greenwald can challenge Rachel Maddow and vice versa. We can argue and make up our own minds. I can’t even believe I’m having to say that in the United States, can you?
P.S. Twitter’s liability will extend to their use, or their allowance, of “bots” to influence opinion. Let’s say there are 100 people arguing up, and 100 people arguing down. If Twitter adds 1,000,000 fake humans arguing the way they want to influence opinion, it has a huge effect. You can find what looks like a bot effort against Governor Ron DeSantis of Florida on Twitter every time he tweets something on monoclonal antibodies. Lawsuits will need to expose the entire Artificial Intelligence system used by Twitter, Facebook and Google to influence opinion, and Congress will need to pass appropriate legislation guaranteeing free speech not dominated by Artificial Intelligence. “We the People.”